Market data · delayed NIFTY 50 Loading SENSEX Loading BANK NIFTY Loading USD/INR Loading
GALE.IN INDIAN EQUITY RESEARCH

Home Long Term

AGI Infra Share Price Target 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030

Published 12 min read Long Term · Screener · Micro Cap

AGI Infra Share Price Target 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030
AGI Infra Ltd AGIIL
Member Valuation Range ₹ ··· – ₹ ··· 🔒 Unlock the valuation view
Live Market Price
Market Cap
₹3,540 Cr
Book Value
₹37.20
Stock P/E
34.60
Dividend Yield
0.04%
ROE
25.00%
ROCE
20.10%
PEG Ratio
1.35
EV/EBITDA

Fundamentals from Screener.in, as of 25 Aug 2026. Live price via Yahoo Finance.

Loading AGIIL chart…

AGIIL chart on TradingView

Technical snapshot

EOD ·

AGI Infra Ltd closed at ₹283.00 on 25 August 2026, down 1.8% on the day, 13.5% below its 50-day average, 34.9% below its 52-week high, with volume at 0.29× its 20-session average.

RSI 14
25.1
vs 50-day SMA
-13.5%
vs 200-day SMA
-9.3%
From 52-week high
-34.9%
Relative volume
0.29×
20-day return
-8.0%

End-of-day prices from exchange-published files (NSE/BSE bhavcopy), updated after market close. Descriptive statistics, not investment advice.

AGI Infra share price today

AGI Infra

The AGI Infra share price target 2030 question is really a test of earnings quality. The Punjab-focused developer reports high margins, 25% ROE and rapid profit growth. Yet operating cash flow has been negative for two consecutive years, borrowings have risen, and FY26 profit benefited from an unusually low tax charge. A property developer can look strongest in accounting terms just as its capital becomes most tied up in projects.

At the 25 August 2026 research cut-off, the logged-in Screener page showed the AGI Infra share price at approximately ₹283 after the completed session, market capitalisation of about ₹3,540 crore, P/E of 34.6 times and book value of ₹37.20 per share. The 52-week range was ₹225 to ₹434. The quote widget changes after publication; the valuation inputs below remain fixed.

Q1 FY27 offered a sharp margin recovery and 38% profit growth on only about 5% revenue growth. That can reflect a favourable project mix and timing of cost recognition. It should not automatically be treated as a new quarterly run rate. For AGI, bookings, construction progress, collections and tax-normalised profit need to agree before the headline P/E becomes dependable.

What AGI Infra builds

AGI Infra is a real-estate developer and construction company based in Jalandhar. Its completed and current portfolio covers apartments, townships, plotted development and commercial units, with a concentration in Jalandhar and a growing presence around Ludhiana. The Jalandhar Heights, Sky Garden, Smart Homes and Urbana families form much of the public project record.

Development typeAGI examplesRevenue driverPrincipal risk
Mid-market apartmentsSmart Homes and Sky Garden phasesBroad local housing demandAffordability and construction timing
Premium apartmentsJalandhar Heights and PrestigeLarger unit value and marginSlower absorption in a narrow catchment
Township / plotsUrbanaLand value plus phased infrastructureLong cash cycle and approvals
Commercial unitsBusiness centres and Urbana SquareSale or rental potentialLocal business demand and vacancy
Affordable housingPunjab projects including policy-linked housingLarge addressable buyer basePrice caps, execution and collection risk

The regional focus creates customer knowledge and operating efficiency. It also concentrates the company in Punjab’s employment, remittance, credit and property cycle. National developers can offset weakness across cities; AGI’s results are more sensitive to a smaller set of local micro-markets.

Q1 FY27: margin, not volume, drove the surprise

Consolidated revenue from operations for the June 2026 quarter was ₹96.44 crore, up 5.3% from ₹91.61 crore in Q1 FY26. Operating profit rose to about ₹40.08 crore, while net profit increased 37.6% to ₹27.54 crore. EPS was ₹2.20. The operating-margin calculation rose to about 41.6% from 33.1%.

Consolidated measureQ1 FY27Q1 FY26Change / interpretation
Revenue from operations₹96.44 Cr₹91.61 CrUp 5.3%
Operating profit₹40.08 Cr₹30.33 CrUp about 32%
Operating margin41.6%33.1%Favourable recognition and cost mix
Profit before tax₹33.37 Cr₹24.26 CrUp 37.6%
Net profit₹27.54 Cr₹20.01 CrUp 37.6%
EPS₹2.20₹1.64Strong per-share outcome

Real-estate quarterly margins move with the projects and units handed over or recognised. Land cost, construction stage and product mix can make two quarters look very different. The March quarter, for example, showed only 24% operating margin before the June rebound. A rolling annual view is safer than extrapolating the best quarter.

FY23 to FY26: profit grew much faster than sales

Revenue rose from ₹240 crore in FY23 to ₹353 crore in FY26, while operating profit more than doubled and reported net profit almost doubled. The operating margin expanded from 24% to 35%. Some improvement can come from project mix and scale; part of the FY26 profit uplift came from tax accounting, which must be normalised when judging sustainable EPS.

Financial yearRevenueOperating marginProfit before taxNet profit
FY23₹240 Cr24%₹54 Cr₹48 Cr
FY24₹292 Cr26%₹66 Cr₹52 Cr
FY25₹325 Cr29%₹74 Cr₹67 Cr
FY26₹353 Cr35%₹96 Cr₹95 Cr
TTM to June 2026₹357 Cr37%₹105 Cr₹102 Cr

The displayed PEG ratio is 1.35, while ROCE is 20.1% and ROE 25%. Those are appealing headline metrics. The caveat is that a P/E based on tax-boosted TTM earnings looks lower than a P/E on a normal tax rate. The scenario model uses reported TTM EPS for consistency, then applies restrained multiples to reflect that uncertainty.

The FY26 tax line needs normalisation

Screener shows FY26 profit before tax of about ₹96 crore and net profit of about ₹95 crore, an effective tax charge near 1%. The March quarter itself carried a tax credit in the provider’s series. This does not mean the company avoided tax improperly; real-estate tax, deferred tax and prior-period adjustments can create large timing effects. It means FY26 reported EPS is not a clean operating run rate.

If a normal effective tax rate had applied, reported profit would have been lower. Investors should read the tax reconciliation in the audited accounts and watch whether Q1’s 17% rate moves toward a stable level. A valuation based on profit before tax, operating cash flow and normalised tax is more robust than taking the trailing P/E at face value.

Project inventory creates growth and cash-flow risk

AGI’s FY25 annual report listed multiple developments at different sales stages. Some mature projects had high absorption; newer phases such as Sky Villas, Jalandhar Heights IV, Smart Home extensions and commercial inventory had more units to sell. This pipeline lets the company recognise revenue over several years if construction and bookings proceed.

It also ties up cash in land, work in progress, approvals and construction. Customer advances may finance part of the cycle, but a slowdown in bookings can leave expenditure running ahead of collections. Unlike a manufacturer, rising inventory is not necessarily a warning—it is often the product under construction. The warning appears when inventory, debt and payables grow without a matching rise in bookings and customer cash.

Cash conversion is the principal counterweight

Screener reports negative operating cash flow in FY25 and FY26 even though net profit rose. Borrowings increased to ₹186 crore, while other liabilities and other assets both expanded materially. For a developer, the balance sheet often captures project funding and customer advances, so each line needs context. The two-year direction still deserves attention.

Cash and balance-sheet measureFY25FY26Reading
Operating cash flowNegative ₹20 CrNegative ₹32 CrAccounting profit did not convert to operating cash
Free cash flowNegative ₹68 CrNegative ₹52 CrProject investment remained cash-absorbing
Borrowings₹137 Cr₹186 CrDebt rose by about one-third
Other liabilities₹764 Cr₹928 CrProject and operating obligations expanded
Other assets₹921 Cr₹1,298 CrInventory, receivables and project assets grew
Fixed assets₹275 Cr₹280 CrMost capital is not in conventional fixed plant

Debt-to-equity near 0.40 is not excessive, and a developer can reverse operating cash flow quickly when collections outpace construction. The evidence to seek is that reversal. A third year of profit growth with negative operating cash would make the quality gap harder to dismiss as timing.

Regional concentration can help until it hurts

AGI’s brand, land sourcing, contractors and buyer relationships are strongest in and around Jalandhar. That local density can lower selling and execution costs. Punjab’s preference for larger homes, non-resident family demand and urbanisation support the opportunity.

The other side is limited geographic diversification. Employment weakness, credit tightening, a fall in remittance-supported demand or oversupply in a few local corridors can affect several projects together. Expansion into another city should be judged on land discipline and collection experience, not on a desire to look nationally diversified.

Valuation at the research cut-off

Valuation measure25 August 2026 readingInterpretation
Completed-session priceApproximately ₹283Fixed research input
Market capitalisationAbout ₹3,540 CrNearly ten times TTM revenue
Screener P/E34.6×Based on tax-aided trailing profit
TTM EPS₹8.28Reported basis through June 2026
Book value per share₹37.20Price-to-book about 7.61×
ROCE / ROE20.1% / 25.0%Strong, subject to cash and tax context
EV/EBITDAAbout 25.3×A demanding enterprise valuation

Seven-and-a-half times book is unusual for a small regional developer unless the land and project pipeline can keep earning high returns. Book value also understates or overstates economic value depending on when land was acquired, but the multiple leaves little tolerance for a booking slowdown or cash-flow misstep.

Valuation framework: reported EPS, cautious multiples

The scenario base is TTM EPS of ₹8.28. Each row applies EPS_TTM × (1 + growth)^(year − 2026 + 128/365) × exit P/E, with the 128/365 fraction representing the part of 2026 remaining after 25 August. Results round to the nearest ₹5 and exclude dividends.

ScenarioAnnual EPS growthExit P/EOperating interpretation
Bear10%20×Tax normalises, sales slow and cash remains tied in projects
Base16%28×Existing projects sell steadily and margins stay healthy
Bull22%36×Absorption, launches and collections sustain high returns

Using reported EPS is transparent but generous if the FY26 tax benefit does not repeat. The lower bear and base multiples compensate partly; readers who prefer a normalised EPS should recalculate before relying on the grid.

AGI Infra share price target 2026 to 2030

These values are scenarios rather than a prediction of how the AGI Infra share price will move each year. A large land purchase, equity issue, exceptional tax adjustment or material change in net debt requires a new starting base.

Risks that can break the thesis

Real-estate demand is cyclical and sensitive to mortgage rates, employment and buyer confidence. Project approvals, land title, environmental permissions and construction delays can change cash timing. Cost inflation can reduce margin when sale prices are fixed. Customer concentration by geography raises local cycle risk.

Accounting recognition can make earnings appear smoother or stronger than collections. Related-party transactions, contingent liabilities and guarantees should be reviewed in every annual report. Low public float and a relatively small shareholder base can amplify the share price in either direction. The near-zero FY26 effective tax rate is a specific risk to trailing valuation, not an assumption investors should repeat indefinitely.

What would change the thesis

The case strengthens if operating cash flow turns positive, bookings and collections are disclosed clearly, debt stabilises and profit remains strong after a normal tax charge. Successful absorption of newer phases without heavy discounting would also support the current return metrics.

It weakens if other assets keep rising much faster than revenue, if launches require more borrowing, if margin reverts sharply as a high-cost project is recognised, or if local inventory takes longer to sell. A qualification in the auditor’s report, land-title dispute or regulatory stop would require immediate reassessment.

Quarterly monitoring scorecard

QuestionConstructive evidenceWarning sign
Are bookings healthy?New launches sell without unusual incentivesUnsold inventory rises across phases
Are collections matching profit?Positive rolling operating cash flowProfit rises while CFO remains negative
Is tax normalising?Stable, explainable effective rateAnother large unexplained credit
Is leverage controlled?Debt stabilises as collections improveBorrowings grow faster than project revenue
Is margin repeatable?Rolling margin stays healthy across project mixOne strong quarter reverses immediately
Is regional risk contained?Measured expansion with proven demandLarge land bets outside core expertise

What to weigh at the current price

AGI Infra has built a recognisable regional franchise, maintained a substantial project pipeline and delivered high reported returns. Q1 FY27 shows that profit can grow even when revenue growth is modest, and leverage remains manageable in headline terms.

The valuation demands stronger evidence than the income statement alone. Cash conversion has been weak, the balance sheet has expanded and trailing profit contains a tax benefit that may not recur. The business case improves materially when project collections fund construction and normal-tax earnings still support the return ratios. Until that is visible, reported growth and economic growth should not be treated as the same thing.

FAQ

What is the AGI Infra share price target for 2030?

The grid uses reported TTM EPS and three growth and valuation cases. It is an illustrative framework, and the tax-normalisation caveat is important when interpreting it.

What does AGI Infra do?

AGI develops residential, township and commercial real estate, principally in Punjab. Its projects include the Jalandhar Heights, Smart Homes, Sky Garden and Urbana families.

Why was AGI Infra’s Q1 FY27 margin high?

Real-estate margin depends on the mix and cost base of projects recognised in a quarter. June had favourable cost and recognition mix, so the result should be compared over several quarters.

Why is AGI Infra’s cash flow negative despite profit?

Cash is invested in land, construction, inventory and receivables before or between customer collections. That timing is normal in development, but repeated negative operating cash flow increases funding risk.

What is the biggest risk to the AGI Infra share price?

A combination of high valuation, weak cash conversion and regional property concentration. A normal tax rate may also make sustainable earnings lower than the trailing figure suggests.

Sources and methodology

Market price, range, valuation and return ratios were visually checked on the logged-in Screener page after the completed 25 August 2026 session. Q1 figures were reconciled to the June result; project references come from company disclosures. Cash-flow and tax interpretation is analytical judgment. The model uses reported TTM EPS, the disclosed formula, 128/365 first-year period and nearest-₹5 rounding. Neither the live quote nor future filings change the fixed grid automatically.


This article is research and education, not personalised investment advice or a recommendation to transact. Gale is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Scenario values are not promises. Verify current filings, project registrations, cash flow, tax notes, liquidity and suitability, and consult a registered adviser before acting.

AGI InfraShare Price TargetReal EstatePunjabHousing