AGI Infra Share Price Target 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030
- Market Cap
- ₹3,540 Cr
- Book Value
- ₹37.20
- Stock P/E
- 34.60
- Dividend Yield
- 0.04%
- ROE
- 25.00%
- ROCE
- 20.10%
- PEG Ratio
- 1.35
- EV/EBITDA
- —
Fundamentals from Screener.in, as of 25 Aug 2026. Live price via Yahoo Finance.
Technical snapshot
EOD ·AGI Infra Ltd closed at ₹283.00 on 25 August 2026, down 1.8% on the day, 13.5% below its 50-day average, 34.9% below its 52-week high, with volume at 0.29× its 20-session average.
- RSI 14
- 25.1
- vs 50-day SMA
- -13.5%
- vs 200-day SMA
- -9.3%
- From 52-week high
- -34.9%
- Relative volume
- 0.29×
- 20-day return
- -8.0%
End-of-day prices from exchange-published files (NSE/BSE bhavcopy), updated after market close. Descriptive statistics, not investment advice.
AGI Infra share price today
The AGI Infra share price target 2030 question is really a test of earnings quality. The Punjab-focused developer reports high margins, 25% ROE and rapid profit growth. Yet operating cash flow has been negative for two consecutive years, borrowings have risen, and FY26 profit benefited from an unusually low tax charge. A property developer can look strongest in accounting terms just as its capital becomes most tied up in projects.
At the 25 August 2026 research cut-off, the logged-in Screener page showed the AGI Infra share price at approximately ₹283 after the completed session, market capitalisation of about ₹3,540 crore, P/E of 34.6 times and book value of ₹37.20 per share. The 52-week range was ₹225 to ₹434. The quote widget changes after publication; the valuation inputs below remain fixed.
Q1 FY27 offered a sharp margin recovery and 38% profit growth on only about 5% revenue growth. That can reflect a favourable project mix and timing of cost recognition. It should not automatically be treated as a new quarterly run rate. For AGI, bookings, construction progress, collections and tax-normalised profit need to agree before the headline P/E becomes dependable.
What AGI Infra builds
AGI Infra is a real-estate developer and construction company based in Jalandhar. Its completed and current portfolio covers apartments, townships, plotted development and commercial units, with a concentration in Jalandhar and a growing presence around Ludhiana. The Jalandhar Heights, Sky Garden, Smart Homes and Urbana families form much of the public project record.
| Development type | AGI examples | Revenue driver | Principal risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-market apartments | Smart Homes and Sky Garden phases | Broad local housing demand | Affordability and construction timing |
| Premium apartments | Jalandhar Heights and Prestige | Larger unit value and margin | Slower absorption in a narrow catchment |
| Township / plots | Urbana | Land value plus phased infrastructure | Long cash cycle and approvals |
| Commercial units | Business centres and Urbana Square | Sale or rental potential | Local business demand and vacancy |
| Affordable housing | Punjab projects including policy-linked housing | Large addressable buyer base | Price caps, execution and collection risk |
The regional focus creates customer knowledge and operating efficiency. It also concentrates the company in Punjab’s employment, remittance, credit and property cycle. National developers can offset weakness across cities; AGI’s results are more sensitive to a smaller set of local micro-markets.
Q1 FY27: margin, not volume, drove the surprise
Consolidated revenue from operations for the June 2026 quarter was ₹96.44 crore, up 5.3% from ₹91.61 crore in Q1 FY26. Operating profit rose to about ₹40.08 crore, while net profit increased 37.6% to ₹27.54 crore. EPS was ₹2.20. The operating-margin calculation rose to about 41.6% from 33.1%.
| Consolidated measure | Q1 FY27 | Q1 FY26 | Change / interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | ₹96.44 Cr | ₹91.61 Cr | Up 5.3% |
| Operating profit | ₹40.08 Cr | ₹30.33 Cr | Up about 32% |
| Operating margin | 41.6% | 33.1% | Favourable recognition and cost mix |
| Profit before tax | ₹33.37 Cr | ₹24.26 Cr | Up 37.6% |
| Net profit | ₹27.54 Cr | ₹20.01 Cr | Up 37.6% |
| EPS | ₹2.20 | ₹1.64 | Strong per-share outcome |
Real-estate quarterly margins move with the projects and units handed over or recognised. Land cost, construction stage and product mix can make two quarters look very different. The March quarter, for example, showed only 24% operating margin before the June rebound. A rolling annual view is safer than extrapolating the best quarter.
FY23 to FY26: profit grew much faster than sales
Revenue rose from ₹240 crore in FY23 to ₹353 crore in FY26, while operating profit more than doubled and reported net profit almost doubled. The operating margin expanded from 24% to 35%. Some improvement can come from project mix and scale; part of the FY26 profit uplift came from tax accounting, which must be normalised when judging sustainable EPS.
| Financial year | Revenue | Operating margin | Profit before tax | Net profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY23 | ₹240 Cr | 24% | ₹54 Cr | ₹48 Cr |
| FY24 | ₹292 Cr | 26% | ₹66 Cr | ₹52 Cr |
| FY25 | ₹325 Cr | 29% | ₹74 Cr | ₹67 Cr |
| FY26 | ₹353 Cr | 35% | ₹96 Cr | ₹95 Cr |
| TTM to June 2026 | ₹357 Cr | 37% | ₹105 Cr | ₹102 Cr |
The displayed PEG ratio is 1.35, while ROCE is 20.1% and ROE 25%. Those are appealing headline metrics. The caveat is that a P/E based on tax-boosted TTM earnings looks lower than a P/E on a normal tax rate. The scenario model uses reported TTM EPS for consistency, then applies restrained multiples to reflect that uncertainty.
The FY26 tax line needs normalisation
Screener shows FY26 profit before tax of about ₹96 crore and net profit of about ₹95 crore, an effective tax charge near 1%. The March quarter itself carried a tax credit in the provider’s series. This does not mean the company avoided tax improperly; real-estate tax, deferred tax and prior-period adjustments can create large timing effects. It means FY26 reported EPS is not a clean operating run rate.
If a normal effective tax rate had applied, reported profit would have been lower. Investors should read the tax reconciliation in the audited accounts and watch whether Q1’s 17% rate moves toward a stable level. A valuation based on profit before tax, operating cash flow and normalised tax is more robust than taking the trailing P/E at face value.
Project inventory creates growth and cash-flow risk
AGI’s FY25 annual report listed multiple developments at different sales stages. Some mature projects had high absorption; newer phases such as Sky Villas, Jalandhar Heights IV, Smart Home extensions and commercial inventory had more units to sell. This pipeline lets the company recognise revenue over several years if construction and bookings proceed.
It also ties up cash in land, work in progress, approvals and construction. Customer advances may finance part of the cycle, but a slowdown in bookings can leave expenditure running ahead of collections. Unlike a manufacturer, rising inventory is not necessarily a warning—it is often the product under construction. The warning appears when inventory, debt and payables grow without a matching rise in bookings and customer cash.
Cash conversion is the principal counterweight
Screener reports negative operating cash flow in FY25 and FY26 even though net profit rose. Borrowings increased to ₹186 crore, while other liabilities and other assets both expanded materially. For a developer, the balance sheet often captures project funding and customer advances, so each line needs context. The two-year direction still deserves attention.
| Cash and balance-sheet measure | FY25 | FY26 | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | Negative ₹20 Cr | Negative ₹32 Cr | Accounting profit did not convert to operating cash |
| Free cash flow | Negative ₹68 Cr | Negative ₹52 Cr | Project investment remained cash-absorbing |
| Borrowings | ₹137 Cr | ₹186 Cr | Debt rose by about one-third |
| Other liabilities | ₹764 Cr | ₹928 Cr | Project and operating obligations expanded |
| Other assets | ₹921 Cr | ₹1,298 Cr | Inventory, receivables and project assets grew |
| Fixed assets | ₹275 Cr | ₹280 Cr | Most capital is not in conventional fixed plant |
Debt-to-equity near 0.40 is not excessive, and a developer can reverse operating cash flow quickly when collections outpace construction. The evidence to seek is that reversal. A third year of profit growth with negative operating cash would make the quality gap harder to dismiss as timing.
Regional concentration can help until it hurts
AGI’s brand, land sourcing, contractors and buyer relationships are strongest in and around Jalandhar. That local density can lower selling and execution costs. Punjab’s preference for larger homes, non-resident family demand and urbanisation support the opportunity.
The other side is limited geographic diversification. Employment weakness, credit tightening, a fall in remittance-supported demand or oversupply in a few local corridors can affect several projects together. Expansion into another city should be judged on land discipline and collection experience, not on a desire to look nationally diversified.
Valuation at the research cut-off
| Valuation measure | 25 August 2026 reading | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Completed-session price | Approximately ₹283 | Fixed research input |
| Market capitalisation | About ₹3,540 Cr | Nearly ten times TTM revenue |
| Screener P/E | 34.6× | Based on tax-aided trailing profit |
| TTM EPS | ₹8.28 | Reported basis through June 2026 |
| Book value per share | ₹37.20 | Price-to-book about 7.61× |
| ROCE / ROE | 20.1% / 25.0% | Strong, subject to cash and tax context |
| EV/EBITDA | About 25.3× | A demanding enterprise valuation |
Seven-and-a-half times book is unusual for a small regional developer unless the land and project pipeline can keep earning high returns. Book value also understates or overstates economic value depending on when land was acquired, but the multiple leaves little tolerance for a booking slowdown or cash-flow misstep.
Valuation framework: reported EPS, cautious multiples
The scenario base is TTM EPS of ₹8.28. Each row applies EPS_TTM × (1 + growth)^(year − 2026 + 128/365) × exit P/E, with the 128/365 fraction representing the part of 2026 remaining after 25 August. Results round to the nearest ₹5 and exclude dividends.
| Scenario | Annual EPS growth | Exit P/E | Operating interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 10% | 20× | Tax normalises, sales slow and cash remains tied in projects |
| Base | 16% | 28× | Existing projects sell steadily and margins stay healthy |
| Bull | 22% | 36× | Absorption, launches and collections sustain high returns |
Using reported EPS is transparent but generous if the FY26 tax benefit does not repeat. The lower bear and base multiples compensate partly; readers who prefer a normalised EPS should recalculate before relying on the grid.
AGI Infra share price target 2026 to 2030
These values are scenarios rather than a prediction of how the AGI Infra share price will move each year. A large land purchase, equity issue, exceptional tax adjustment or material change in net debt requires a new starting base.
Risks that can break the thesis
Real-estate demand is cyclical and sensitive to mortgage rates, employment and buyer confidence. Project approvals, land title, environmental permissions and construction delays can change cash timing. Cost inflation can reduce margin when sale prices are fixed. Customer concentration by geography raises local cycle risk.
Accounting recognition can make earnings appear smoother or stronger than collections. Related-party transactions, contingent liabilities and guarantees should be reviewed in every annual report. Low public float and a relatively small shareholder base can amplify the share price in either direction. The near-zero FY26 effective tax rate is a specific risk to trailing valuation, not an assumption investors should repeat indefinitely.
What would change the thesis
The case strengthens if operating cash flow turns positive, bookings and collections are disclosed clearly, debt stabilises and profit remains strong after a normal tax charge. Successful absorption of newer phases without heavy discounting would also support the current return metrics.
It weakens if other assets keep rising much faster than revenue, if launches require more borrowing, if margin reverts sharply as a high-cost project is recognised, or if local inventory takes longer to sell. A qualification in the auditor’s report, land-title dispute or regulatory stop would require immediate reassessment.
Quarterly monitoring scorecard
| Question | Constructive evidence | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Are bookings healthy? | New launches sell without unusual incentives | Unsold inventory rises across phases |
| Are collections matching profit? | Positive rolling operating cash flow | Profit rises while CFO remains negative |
| Is tax normalising? | Stable, explainable effective rate | Another large unexplained credit |
| Is leverage controlled? | Debt stabilises as collections improve | Borrowings grow faster than project revenue |
| Is margin repeatable? | Rolling margin stays healthy across project mix | One strong quarter reverses immediately |
| Is regional risk contained? | Measured expansion with proven demand | Large land bets outside core expertise |
What to weigh at the current price
AGI Infra has built a recognisable regional franchise, maintained a substantial project pipeline and delivered high reported returns. Q1 FY27 shows that profit can grow even when revenue growth is modest, and leverage remains manageable in headline terms.
The valuation demands stronger evidence than the income statement alone. Cash conversion has been weak, the balance sheet has expanded and trailing profit contains a tax benefit that may not recur. The business case improves materially when project collections fund construction and normal-tax earnings still support the return ratios. Until that is visible, reported growth and economic growth should not be treated as the same thing.
FAQ
What is the AGI Infra share price target for 2030?
The grid uses reported TTM EPS and three growth and valuation cases. It is an illustrative framework, and the tax-normalisation caveat is important when interpreting it.
What does AGI Infra do?
AGI develops residential, township and commercial real estate, principally in Punjab. Its projects include the Jalandhar Heights, Smart Homes, Sky Garden and Urbana families.
Why was AGI Infra’s Q1 FY27 margin high?
Real-estate margin depends on the mix and cost base of projects recognised in a quarter. June had favourable cost and recognition mix, so the result should be compared over several quarters.
Why is AGI Infra’s cash flow negative despite profit?
Cash is invested in land, construction, inventory and receivables before or between customer collections. That timing is normal in development, but repeated negative operating cash flow increases funding risk.
What is the biggest risk to the AGI Infra share price?
A combination of high valuation, weak cash conversion and regional property concentration. A normal tax rate may also make sustainable earnings lower than the trailing figure suggests.
Related research
- IRB Infrastructure share price target
- Larsen & Toubro share price target
- Cera Sanitaryware share price target
Sources and methodology
- AGI Infra investor-relations disclosures
- AGI Infra June 2026 financial results
- AGI Infra annual reports and project schedules
- AGI Infra FY26 board outcome and audited results
- AGI Infra consolidated financials on Screener
Market price, range, valuation and return ratios were visually checked on the logged-in Screener page after the completed 25 August 2026 session. Q1 figures were reconciled to the June result; project references come from company disclosures. Cash-flow and tax interpretation is analytical judgment. The model uses reported TTM EPS, the disclosed formula, 128/365 first-year period and nearest-₹5 rounding. Neither the live quote nor future filings change the fixed grid automatically.
This article is research and education, not personalised investment advice or a recommendation to transact. Gale is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Scenario values are not promises. Verify current filings, project registrations, cash flow, tax notes, liquidity and suitability, and consult a registered adviser before acting.