INDEX FUNDS · COMPUTED FROM AMFI's PUBLISHED NAVs
Nifty 50 index mutual funds, compared
21 mutual funds track the Nifty 50 — the same fifty stocks, in the same weights — yet their returns differ, because each charges its own costs and tracks the index with its own precision. Every NAV below comes from AMFI's published file as of ; the 1, 3 and 5-year figures are annualised returns computed by Gale from those NAVs, direct-growth plans only. Sorted by 5-year return — a sort order, not a verdict.
| Fund | NAV (₹) | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Data since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Navi Nifty 50 Index Fund | 16.04 | -0.44% | 8.91% | 8.98% | 2021 |
| BANDHAN Nifty 50 Index Fund | 54.41 | -0.47% | 8.89% | 8.98% | 2013 |
| Motilal Oswal Nifty 50 Index Fund | 21.21 | -0.44% | 8.93% | 8.96% | 2019 |
| UTI Nifty 50 Index Fund - Growth Option | 171.03 | -0.49% | 8.87% | 8.93% | 2013 |
| DSP Nifty 50 Index Fund | 23.99 | -0.45% | 8.89% | 8.92% | 2019 |
| Axis Nifty 50 Index Fund | 14.78 | -0.45% | 8.90% | — | 2021 |
| Edelweiss Nifty 50 Index Fund Direct Plan Growth | 14.41 | -0.39% | 8.89% | — | 2021 |
| HSBC NIFTY 50 INDEX FUND | 28.77 | -0.52% | 8.89% | — | 2022 |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Nifty 50 Index Fund - Growth | 253.78 | -0.50% | 8.86% | 8.87% | 2013 |
| Kotak Nifty 50 Index Fund | 16.15 | -0.42% | 8.81% | 8.86% | 2021 |
| Franklin India INDEX FUND- NSE NIFTY 50 INDEX FUND | 207.84 | -0.51% | 8.88% | 8.85% | 2013 |
| LIC MF Nifty 50 Index Fund | 145.59 | -0.96% | 8.64% | 8.77% | 2013 |
| Taurus Nifty 50 Index Fund | 49.36 | -1.23% | 7.99% | 8.18% | 2013 |
| ANGEL ONE NIFTY 50 INDEX FUND | 10.01 | -0.59% | — | — | 2025 |
| Bajaj Finserv Nifty 50 Index Fund | 9.93 | -0.83% | — | — | 2025 |
| Baroda BNP Paribas Nifty 50 Index Fund | 11.47 | -0.60% | — | — | 2024 |
| Choice Nifty 50 Index Fund | 10.51 | — | — | — | 2026 |
| Groww Nifty 50 Index Fund | 9.75 | -0.84% | — | — | 2025 |
| JioBlackRock Nifty 50 Index Fund | 9.85 | — | — | — | 2025 |
| Mirae Asset Nifty 50 Index Fund | 10.14 | -0.53% | — | — | 2024 |
| Zerodha Nifty 50 Index Fund | 9.72 | — | — | — | 2025 |
Method: CAGR = (NAV today ÷ NAV n years ago)^(365/days) − 1, from AMFI daily NAVs; '—' means the fund is younger than the period. Newer funds show fewer periods, not worse performance. Expense ratios and tracking-difference columns are being added next.
What is a Nifty 50 index mutual fund?
It is a mutual fund that holds the fifty companies of the Nifty 50 in the same proportions as the index, and does nothing else. No manager decides that one bank looks cheaper than another; when the index committee changes a constituent, the fund follows. Because nothing is being predicted, the fund can charge very little — and that low cost, compounded across decades, is the entire proposition.
The consequence shows up in the table above. Every fund listed owns the same fifty stocks, so the differences you see are not stock-picking skill. They are cost, cash drag and execution — the three things that separate a tracker from the thing it tracks.
Why do returns differ between Nifty 50 index funds?
Four mechanisms, in rough order of how much they matter over a decade:
- Expense ratio. Deducted daily inside the NAV, so it never appears as a charge you can see — it appears as a return you never received. See how expense ratio and exit load work.
- Cash drag. Money arriving from investors is not invested the same instant. In a rising market that idle cash lags the index; in a falling one it cushions.
- Index-change execution. When the Nifty 50 swaps a constituent, every tracker must trade the same names on the same day. How well a fund handles that congestion shows up quietly in its tracking difference.
- Dividend handling. Constituents pay dividends; how quickly the fund reinvests them creates small, persistent differences.
How to compare Nifty 50 index funds
Past return is the number everyone sorts by and the weakest basis for choosing, because the spread above is small and partly reflects the period the fund happened to live through. Three things describe a tracker better:
- Tracking difference — how far the fund's return sat below the index over the same window. It bundles cost and execution into one honest number. (This table adds a tracking-difference column in the next data pass.)
- Expense ratio — published in every scheme's factsheet, and the most persistent of the differences: a fund that charges less this year will very likely charge less next year too.
- Fund size and age — a larger, older tracker has demonstrated it can absorb flows through index changes. Newer funds in the table show fewer periods, which is a matter of age, not quality.
One structural point that matters more than any of the above: these are all direct plans. The regular plan of the same scheme carries distributor commission inside its expense ratio, and that gap is usually larger than every difference in this table put together.
Index fund or ETF for the Nifty 50?
Both track the same index. An index fund is bought at the day's NAV with no demat account and supports automated instalments; an ETF trades on the exchange like a share, needs a demat account, and its market price can drift from its underlying value when trading is thin. The full comparison, including where each structure quietly costs more, is in ETF vs mutual fund.
If fund vocabulary is new, what NAV actually measures clears up the most common confusion — a low NAV is not a cheap fund — and what a mutual fund is covers the structure that holds your money.
Index fund questions
Why do funds tracking the same index show different returns?
Costs and craft. Each fund charges its own expense ratio and manages cash, index changes and dividends slightly differently, so returns drift from the index and from each other. Over long periods, small annual differences compound into visible gaps — which is exactly what this table lets you see.
Are these direct or regular plans?
Direct-growth plans only. Direct plans skip distributor commission, so their expense ratios are lower and long-term returns higher than regular plans of the same fund.
Is the top fund in this table the best one?
The table is sorted by past 5-year return, which is a sort order, not a verdict. Past return differences partly reflect costs (persistent) and partly luck of timing (not). Expense ratio and tracking consistency matter more than a few basis points of historical CAGR.
Where do these numbers come from?
Every NAV comes from AMFI’s published daily NAV file; returns are computed by Gale.in as annualised CAGRs from those NAVs. The data date is shown above the table, and the page hides itself rather than show stale numbers.
How many Nifty 50 index funds are there in India?
Around two dozen asset managers run a Nifty 50 index fund, and the count grows as new AMCs launch one — it is the default first product for a new fund house. This page lists every direct-growth plan currently in AMFI’s daily NAV file, so the number updates itself as funds launch or merge.
Is a Nifty 50 index fund better than an actively managed fund?
That is a question about costs versus the odds of a manager beating the index after fees, not something this table settles. What the table does show is that among funds holding identical portfolios, cost differences alone create a visible return spread over five years.
Do these funds pay dividends?
These are growth plans, so dividends received from the fifty companies are reinvested into the fund rather than paid out, and they show up as NAV growth. IDCW variants of the same schemes distribute instead, which changes the NAV path but not the underlying holdings.