Bondada Engineering Share Price Target 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030
- Market Cap
- ₹3,152 Cr
- Book Value
- ₹62.20
- Stock P/E
- 14.40
- Dividend Yield
- 0.10%
- ROE
- 35.70%
- ROCE
- 39.40%
- PEG Ratio
- 0.12
- EV/EBITDA
- 9.01
Fundamentals from Screener.in, as of 25 Aug 2026. Live price via Yahoo Finance.
Technical snapshot
EOD ·Bondada Engineering Ltd closed at ₹282.25 on 25 August 2026, down 1.1% on the day, 8.0% below its 50-day average, 43.9% below its 52-week high, with volume at 0.70× its 20-session average.
- RSI 14
- 39.2
- vs 50-day SMA
- -8.0%
- vs 200-day SMA
- -14.4%
- From 52-week high
- -43.9%
- Relative volume
- 0.70×
- 20-day return
- -5.7%
End-of-day prices from exchange-published files (NSE/BSE bhavcopy), updated after market close. Descriptive statistics, not investment advice.
Bondada Engineering share price today
Bondada Engineering has moved from a telecom contractor into a fast-growing infrastructure group spanning solar EPC, power projects, battery storage, telecom towers, rail systems and manufactured products. Revenue and profit have multiplied, and the disclosed order pipeline is large. The investment tension is whether a small balance sheet can execute that book without working-capital stress, governance slippage or a fall in project margins.
At the 25 August 2026 cut-off, the Bondada Engineering share price was about ₹281.80 on the BSE. Signed-in Screener showed a rounded current price of ₹282, market capitalisation of ₹3,152 crore, trailing EPS of ₹19.55 and P/E of 14.4 times. This BSE-only counter has had inconsistent third-party live-feed adjustments, so the live widget is deliberately disabled; verify the exchange quote before any decision.
What Bondada Engineering actually does
Bondada began with telecom engineering, procurement and construction, then added solar EPC and operations and maintenance. It now operates through subsidiaries in renewable energy, engineering products, battery storage and related infrastructure. The group can survey a site, design and build a project, supply structures or towers, and maintain the asset after commissioning.
| Business line | What Bondada provides | Main risk |
|---|---|---|
| Solar EPC | Civil, electrical, mounting and commissioning work | Module/client dependency and execution timing |
| Renewable IPP | Ownership or development of generating assets | Capital intensity and tariff economics |
| Telecom EPC and O&M | Towers, fibre, active/passive infrastructure | Customer concentration and receivables |
| BESS | Battery storage system execution | New technology, guarantees and integration |
| Railways | Kavach and signalling infrastructure | Approvals and milestone billing |
| Products | Towers, mounting structures, AAC blocks, LEDs and motors | Utilisation and subsidiary complexity |
Diversification is attractive only if each unit earns cash. An order in solar EPC has different margin, advance and guarantee requirements from a telecom O&M contract or an owned power asset. Group revenue can grow while the cash demands of the mix rise even faster.
Q1 FY27 kept growth positive but below the annual ambition
The June 2026 quarter delivered consolidated revenue of ₹691.65 crore, up 24% year on year, and PAT of ₹53.94 crore, up about 29%. Operating margin was 11%, close to the recent band. The quarter was lower than March sequentially, which is not unusual in project businesses but makes full-year guidance more demanding.
| Consolidated result | Q1 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹558 Cr | ₹914 Cr | ₹692 Cr | Up 24% YoY, seasonally below March |
| Operating profit | ₹65 Cr | ₹96 Cr | ₹78 Cr | Broadly tracked revenue growth |
| Operating margin | 12% | 11% | 11% | Stable, not expanding materially |
| Profit before tax | ₹57 Cr | ₹87 Cr | ₹73 Cr | Finance cost remains relevant |
| Net profit | ₹42 Cr | ₹63 Cr | ₹54 Cr | Up about 29% YoY |
| EPS | ₹3.43 | ₹5.30 | ₹4.74 | Useful current run-rate check |
Management had discussed much faster FY27 growth based on order execution. One quarter does not invalidate that plan, because milestone billing can be uneven. It does raise the bar for the rest of the year and makes order-to-revenue conversion more important than new award announcements.
FY26 established a much larger base
FY26 revenue rose to ₹2,843 crore from ₹1,571 crore and PAT to ₹211 crore from ₹113 crore. Operating margin increased by roughly one percentage point. The TTM series through June 2026 shows revenue of ₹2,977 crore and PAT of ₹223 crore.
| Metric | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | TTM to Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹801 Cr | ₹1,571 Cr | ₹2,843 Cr | ₹2,977 Cr |
| Operating profit | ₹68 Cr | ₹175 Cr | ₹335 Cr | ₹337 Cr |
| Operating margin | 9% | 11% | 12% | 11% |
| Net profit | ₹46 Cr | ₹113 Cr | ₹211 Cr | ₹223 Cr |
| EPS | ₹4.14 | ₹9.97 | ₹18.23 | ₹19.55 |
The doubling pattern cannot continue indefinitely without a much larger capital base. The appropriate question is whether Bondada can grow from here at a rate that preserves return on capital after receivables, inventory, guarantees and owned renewable assets are included.
The order book is large, but quality matters more than the headline
Following August 2026 awards, public disclosures placed the consolidated order book near ₹10,023 crore, more than three times TTM revenue. A recent win of about ₹514 crore covered 200 MW/400 MWh of battery-storage projects and 100 BSNL towers, scheduled during FY27. The 11 August filing marked both promoter or promoter-group interest and the related-party-transaction field as Yes. That makes arm’s-length terms, execution and collection on this headline award especially important to monitor. Earlier company material showed renewables as the largest part of the book, followed by telecom, railways and products.
| Order-book question | Better outcome | Riskier outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Customer quality | Strong counterparties and funded projects | Awards depend on weak intermediaries |
| Payment terms | Mobilisation advance and milestone collections | Large retention and delayed certification |
| Margin protection | Escalation or back-to-back procurement | Fixed price with volatile inputs |
| Execution period | Capacity matched to schedule | Too many projects peak together |
| Guarantees | Limited, priced and released on time | Contingent liabilities compound |
| Related parties | Transparent arm’s-length terms | Economics are hard to verify |
Order book is not revenue and revenue is not cash. Cancellations, rescoping, client-supplied materials and taxes can all make the announced number differ from the profit opportunity. Investors should track executable unbilled work rather than adding every memorandum and L1 position.
Renewable energy now drives the group
Screener’s company notes place renewable energy at roughly 79% of FY26 revenue. That reflects the rapid build-out of solar EPC, while Bondada is also pursuing independent power projects and battery storage. Solar construction benefits from India’s capacity additions, but it is competitive and working-capital intensive.
An owned IPP can produce recurring cash after commissioning, yet it introduces debt, project finance, land, evacuation and counterparty risk. A contractor and an asset owner deserve different valuation multiples. Bondada should disclose the capital and return profile of each clearly as the mix evolves.
Telecom provides credentials and recurring work
Telecom was Bondada’s original operating base. The company has built and maintained towers and fibre networks for operators and public-sector programmes, including BSNL-linked work. O&M revenue can be steadier than EPC, while tower construction creates repeat credentials across regions.
The risks are familiar: a small number of large customers, slow certification, retention money and penalties for delays. Telecom growth is most valuable when it adds cash-generative O&M rather than only low-margin material supply.
Battery storage and railways are options, not proven earnings streams
BESS and railway signalling can widen the addressable market. Storage is becoming important as renewable penetration rises, and Kavach investment creates rail opportunity. Bondada’s early awards help establish credentials.
These businesses should initially be valued with caution. Battery projects carry technology, performance and warranty interfaces; rail projects carry certification and execution dependencies. The bull case needs repeat orders completed at a healthy margin, not only a growing announcement count.
Working capital is the central financial risk
FY26 operating cash flow recovered to ₹125 crore after a ₹141 crore outflow in FY25. That is progress, but only 44% of FY26 operating profit converted to CFO. The cash-conversion cycle was 138 days, inventories rose, and borrowings reached ₹292 crore.
| Cash and balance-sheet item | FY25 | FY26 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -₹141 Cr | ₹125 Cr | Recovery, still below profit |
| Free cash flow | -₹169 Cr | ₹84 Cr | Positive after a weak prior year |
| Borrowings | ₹192 Cr | ₹292 Cr | Funding expanded activity |
| Other liabilities | ₹561 Cr | ₹1,055 Cr | Project scale increased obligations |
| Debtor days | 124 | 102 | Improved, still lengthy |
| Inventory days | 94 | 134 | More cash tied in execution |
| Cash-conversion cycle | 110 days | 138 days | Working-capital demand increased |
For an EPC company, quarterly cash can be noisy. The warning would be a multi-year pattern in which PAT rises but cumulative CFO does not. Balance-sheet expansion must be funded in proportion to customer advances and collections, not just bank lines.
Return ratios are high because execution has been fast
Signed-in Screener showed 39.4% ROCE and 35.7% ROE at the cut-off. These figures explain much of the market interest. They are backward-looking and can fall as Bondada invests in owned assets or holds more working capital.
| Quality and valuation measure | 25 Aug 2026 | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| ROCE | 39.4% | Excellent historical capital productivity |
| ROE | 35.7% | High, with some financial leverage |
| Debt to equity | 0.42× | Manageable but rising with scale |
| Price to book | 4.54× | Premium relies on high ROE persisting |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.01× | Moderate for the reported growth |
| PEG ratio | 0.12 | Backward CAGR makes it look very low |
The PEG ratio is especially easy to overread because recent profit growth began from a small base. No mature EPC platform compounds at the historical rate forever. Our scenarios therefore step growth down sharply.
Shareholding and governance deserve extra attention
Promoter holding declined from 63.34% in March 2025 to 61.52% in June 2026. FII and DII holdings were small, while the number of shareholders rose from about 9,000 to over 17,000 in fifteen months. Promoter ownership remains substantial, but subsidiaries and related-party awards make group-level transparency important.
Investors should read the purpose, counterparty interest, pricing, execution terms and board approvals for related-party contracts rather than assuming every group transaction is either good or bad. The issue is verifiability.
Valuation at the fixed price
At ₹281.80, Bondada traded near 14.4 times trailing earnings and 4.54 times book. The share was about 44% below its 52-week high of ₹503 and roughly 31% above the low of ₹215.00.
| Valuation item | Fixed-date value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | ₹281.80 | BSE close, 25 Aug 2026 |
| Market capitalisation | About ₹3,152 Cr | Signed-in Screener |
| Trailing EPS | ₹19.55 | TTM through Jun 2026 |
| Price to earnings | 14.4× | Screener headline and TTM base |
| Book value | ₹62.20 per share | Consolidated reported equity |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | Earnings largely retained |
| 52-week range | ₹215.00–₹503 | Material de-rating from the high |
The multiple is not demanding if mid-teens earnings growth converts to cash. It is not obviously cheap if execution requires continuous debt and the high ROCE normalises. The price decline has removed exuberance, not project risk.
Bondada Engineering share price target methodology
The model begins with trailing EPS of ₹19.55. Bear, base and bull paths use annual EPS growth of 8%, 16% and 24% with exit P/E multiples of 10, 15 and 20 times. The 2026 row compounds for 128/365 of a year from 25 August to 31 December; later rows add one full year each. Outputs round to the nearest ₹5 and exclude the small dividend.
| Scenario | EPS growth | Exit P/E | Operating interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 8% | 10× | Slower conversion, margin pressure and higher working capital |
| Base | 16% | 15× | Order execution remains healthy with controlled leverage |
| Bull | 24% | 20× | Renewable, telecom and storage scale with strong cash conversion |
Even the bull case is below the historical profit CAGR. That is intentional: the company is now much larger, and the constraint shifts from winning orders to funding and delivering them.
Bondada Engineering share price target 2026 to 2030
The scenario grid should be refreshed when the executable order book, share count, net debt or trailing EPS changes. It does not separately capitalise the renewable IPP pipeline or contingent liabilities.
What would change the thesis
The thesis improves if revenue conversion accelerates without margin dilution, operating cash flow consistently tracks PAT, debtor and inventory days fall, and net debt grows slower than EBITDA. Separate segment disclosure for EPC, owned renewables, storage, telecom and products would justify more confidence.
It weakens if order announcements do not become billing, working capital again turns deeply negative, related-party transactions become material without clear economics, guarantees rise sharply, or owned assets absorb capital before the EPC business generates it.
Quarterly monitoring scorecard
| Question | Constructive evidence | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Is the book converting? | Revenue grows in line with scheduled awards | Order book rises while revenue stalls |
| Is margin protected? | OPM holds near 11%–12% | Competitive awards compress spread |
| Is profit becoming cash? | CFO approaches PAT over twelve months | Receivables and inventory dominate cash |
| Is debt proportionate? | Net debt/EBITDA remains controlled | Borrowing grows faster than earnings |
| Are new segments proven? | Repeat BESS and rail completions | Awards without profitable commissioning |
| Is governance transparent? | Detailed related-party and segment terms | Complex subsidiary flows obscure economics |
What to weigh at the current price
Bondada’s growth is genuine: FY26 nearly doubled revenue, Q1 FY27 added another year-on-year increase, returns are high and the order book can sustain several years of activity. The lower share price and moderate earnings multiple create a more balanced setup than the peak valuation did.
The deciding issue is cash discipline. This is no longer a small contractor that can grow from retained profit alone without strain. The opportunity is attractive only if collections, guarantees and debt remain as well managed as execution. Position sizing and BSE liquidity matter as much as the spreadsheet upside.
FAQ
What is the Bondada Engineering share price target for 2030?
The grid above shows bear, base and bull scenario values based on trailing EPS, three growth rates and three exit multiples. It is not a guaranteed price.
Why is the Bondada Engineering share price volatile?
It is a relatively small, BSE-only company with rapid growth, large order announcements and changing capital requirements. Expectations can move faster than quarterly revenue and cash flow.
What is Bondada Engineering’s main business?
Renewable energy EPC is currently the largest revenue contributor, alongside telecom EPC and O&M, storage, railway work and manufactured infrastructure products.
Is Bondada Engineering’s large order book equal to future revenue?
No. Awards still face scheduling, scope, certification, cancellation, funding and collection risks. The executable order book and its margin are more useful than the gross headline.
What is the biggest risk in Bondada Engineering shares?
Working-capital and execution strain. Rapid growth can consume cash through inventory, receivables, guarantees and project assets even while reported profit rises.
Related research
Sources and methodology
- Bondada Engineering consolidated financials on Screener
- Bondada investor presentations
- Bondada H1 FY26 corporate presentation filed with BSE
- Bondada 11 August 2026 order filing
- Bondada Q1 FY27 results filing
- Bondada financial results
Price, market ratios, TTM accounts, cash flow and shareholding were verified on the signed-in Screener consolidated page after the 25 August 2026 session. Q1 figures were checked against the filed results; business and historical order-book facts were cross-checked against company presentations. The model uses EPS × growth × exit P/E, a 128/365 stub for 2026 and nearest-₹5 rounding. It does not separately model project finance, guarantees, dilution or IPP asset value.
This article is research and education, not personalised investment advice or a recommendation to transact. Gale is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Price targets are scenario arithmetic, not promises. Verify current BSE filings, liquidity, related-party transactions and suitability, and consult a registered adviser before acting.